Chris and Shalisa Wedding

Murdoch University Enterprise Agreement

Mr Murdoch began negotiations in April 2016 with the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) for a new agreement. It attempted to remove or amend a number of clauses that it considered to be obstacles to its ability to improve its financial and operational performance. Between April and November 2016, the parties held 23 negotiating meetings, but both sides had limited freedom of movement on key issues. When negotiations were stalled in December 2016, Murdoch filed a request to file a request to the Fair Work Commission to file a request to denounce the agreement. The NTEU rejected the application. Joellen Riley, dean of the university`s Law School, who publicly resigned from the NTEU in 2013 because of her industrial activism, is now on the university`s side. She described the negotiations of the last six months as constructive and collegial. “I think it`s a crisis for enterprise trading,” she says. “You can`t negotiate fairly anymore.” The university`s offer retains the terms of the current contract, including 50 days of personal vacation per year. It is also proposed to introduce 22 weeks of paid parental leave for fathers and same-sex partners.

The university is offering a 2.1 percent pay increase, but the union insists on 2.4 percent and plans more strikes next month to get it. The university wants to be more flexible in the way academic staff divide their time between teaching and research, including managing your person`s staff. It works with a deficit and puts them under heavy financial burdens. McManus accuses lawyers of distorting the model of denouncing enterprise agreements to employers and accuses Murdoch University of improperly spending up to $2.8 million in public funds to “find its own way in negotiations.” Reid, who represented Murdoch University, said most employers would probably not want to take the drastic step of terminating an enterprise agreement. It rejects the unions` allegations that the case has undermined negotiations on companies. Birmingham believes that there is room to reduce university funding rates based on their ability to absorb costs through more modern and efficient staff structures. But while insisting that a slather be opened, the lab wants new laws that prevent employers from terminating enterprise agreements so easily. Contrary to the university`s argument, the union argued that denouncing the agreement would make it more difficult for the union and management to reach a future agreement. She applied – and won – for the right to terminate the university`s enterprise contract with staff. It was a pioneering choice for a public institution, and the Fair Work Commission`s verdict shocked university staff across the country. It is also expected to fuel greater militancy on the part of trade unions and employers.

The lab says bargaining power is reversed in favour of bosses and wants to change fair labour laws to limit employers` ability to terminate contracts. NSW Secretary of State for the union, Michael Thomson, says 2.4% are in line with NSW`s public sector tariffs. Union members also pointed out that the University`s Vice-Chancellor, Michael Spence, received a salary envelope of $1.4 million last year $US, including a $200,000 bonus.