The opening of the border between North and South was decisive. If this had been questionable, there would never have been a peace agreement. It`s as simple as that. The agreement called for the creation of an independent commission to review police rules in Northern Ireland, “including ways to promote broad community support” for these agreements. The UK government has also pledged to carry out a “large-scale review” of the criminal justice system in Northern Ireland. “The protocol clearly establishes the principle that NI is part of the UK`s customs territory, so that goods can move from Britain to the NI without tariffs. The British authorities have provisions to impose EU tariffs on goods “threatened” to cross the open border into the EU. The problem is that the circumstances under which goods should be considered “endangered” are not defined in the protocol and that a joint agreement with the EU on the rules that would define it is necessary. The Good Friday Agreement (GFA) or the Belfast Agreement (Irish: Comhaonté Aoine an Chéasta or Comhaonté Bhéal Feirste; Ulster-Scots: Guid Friday Greeance or Bilfawst Greeance) is a couple of agreements signed on 10 April 1998 that put an end to most of the violence of the Troubles, a political conflict in Northern Ireland that had erupted since the late 1960s. This was an important development in the Northern Ireland peace process in the 1990s. Northern Ireland`s current system of de-decentralized government is based on the agreement. The agreement also created a number of institutions between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, as well as between the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom. Europe will demand the abolition of the DUP veto and just about the backstop station of the customs union.
But even if the Johnson government finally admits everything, the result would be a terrible deal for the UK. And as the proposal is currently underway, it fundamentally undermines the Good Friday agreement. Because of the broken reflection of the mirrors in the mirrors of “The Signing of Peace in the Hall of Mirrors” (1919), Catherine Marshall and Fintan O`Toole claim that orpen hinted at “the weakness of the agreement.” The weakness was exacerbated by the U.S. Senate`s refusal to ratify it, and the U.S. government distanced itself from most of its provisions.